<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Black Hat SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seofriendly.com/category/black-hat-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seofriendly.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:17:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stop HR 3261 (SOPA) and S 968 (PIPA) Internet Blacklist Bills</title>
		<link>http://www.seofriendly.com/stop-hr-3261-sopa-and-s-968-pipa-internet-blacklist-bills/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seofriendly.com/stop-hr-3261-sopa-and-s-968-pipa-internet-blacklist-bills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[List Of The Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organic SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PageRank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seofriendly.com/?p=374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stop HR 3261 (SOPA) and S 968 (PIPA) Internet Blacklist Bills Congress needs to hear from you, or these dangerous bills will pass &#8211; they have tremendous lobbying dollars behind them, from large corporations reportedly hoping to prop up outdated, anti-consumer business models at the expense of the very fabric of the Internet &#8212; recklessly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stop HR 3261 (SOPA) and S 968 (PIPA) Internet Blacklist Bills</strong></p>
<p>Congress needs to hear from you, or these dangerous bills will pass &#8211; they have tremendous lobbying dollars behind them, from large corporations reportedly hoping to prop up outdated, anti-consumer business models at the expense of the very fabric of the Internet &#8212; recklessly unleashing a tsunami of take-down notices and litigation, and a Pandora&#8217;s jar of &#8220;chilling effects&#8221; and other unintended (or perhaps intended?) consequences.</p>
<p>Please let your Members of Congress know you OPPOSE H.R. 3621 &#8220;Stop Online Piracy Act&#8221; (SOPA) and S. 968 &#8220;Protect IP Act&#8221; (PIPA):</p>
<ul>
<li>Phone, yes phone your Member of Congress! (<a href="http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/mcapdir.aspx">House</a>) (<a href="http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm">Senate</a>)</li>
<li>EFF <a href="https://action.eff.org/o/9042/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=8173">Congressional Emailer &#8211; Oppose Internet Blacklisting (SOPA &amp; PIPA)</a></li>
<li>OpenCongress <a href="http://www.opencongress.org/contact_congress_letters/new?bill=112-h3261&amp;position=oppose">Congressional Emailer &#8211; Oppose SOPA</a></li>
<li>Generic <a href="https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml">Congressional Emailer</a> (You&#8217;ll need your <a href="https://tools.usps.com/go/ZipLookupAction!input.action">Zip+4</a>)</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Learn more about SOPA, Protect IP (PIPA), and Internet Blacklisting:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://cdt.org/report/growing-chorus-opposition-stop-online-piracy-act">Growing Chorus of Opposition to SOPA</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/12/internet-inventors-warn-against-sopa-and-pipa">Open Letter against SOPA from 83 Prominent Internet Engineers</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111122/04254316872/definitive-post-why-sopa-protect-ip-are-bad-bad-ideas.shtml">Why SOPA and Protect IP (PIPA) are Bad, Bad Ideas</a> (Techdirt)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;tbm=nws&amp;q=SOPA">SOPA News</a> (Google News)</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Online_Piracy_Act">SOPA Wikipedia entry</a></li>
<li><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57329001-281/how-sopa-would-affect-you-faq/?tag=mncol;txt">SOPA FAQ</a> (CNET)</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;tbm=nws&amp;btnmeta_news_search=1&amp;q=internet+blackout+sopa&amp;oq=internet+blackout+sopa">Internet Giants Consider Blackout Against SOPA!</a></p>
<p><a href="http://projects.propublica.org/sopa/">Where does your Member of Congress stand on SOPA?</a> (Project SOPA Opera)</p>
<p>Opponents of SOPA: Google, Yahoo, Wikipedia, craigslist, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, eBay, AOL, Mozilla, Reddit, Tumblr, Etsy, Zynga, EFF, ACLU, Human Rights Watch, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Ron Paul (R-TX)</p>
<p>Supporters of SOPA: RIAA, MPAA, News Corporation, VISA, Mastercard, Pfizer, Comcast, Time Warner, ABC, Nike, Walmart, Dow Chemical, Tiffany, Chanel, Rolex, Monster Cable, Teamsters, Lamar Smith (R-TX), John Conyers (D-MI)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seofriendly.com/stop-hr-3261-sopa-and-s-968-pipa-internet-blacklist-bills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RipOff Report Removal Bug Exposed – Reputation Management</title>
		<link>http://www.seofriendly.com/ripoff-report-removal-bug-exposed-%e2%80%93-reputation-management-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seofriendly.com/ripoff-report-removal-bug-exposed-%e2%80%93-reputation-management-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RipOff Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seofriendly.com/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read It Here: http://www.seofriendly.com/hacking-ripoff-report-reputation-management-style/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read It Here: <a href="http://www.seofriendly.com/hacking-ripoff-report-reputation-management-style/">http://www.seofriendly.com/hacking-ripoff-report-reputation-management-style/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seofriendly.com/ripoff-report-removal-bug-exposed-%e2%80%93-reputation-management-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ripoff report removal bug exposed &#8211;  reputation management</title>
		<link>http://www.seofriendly.com/ripoff-report-removal-bug-exposed-reputation-management/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seofriendly.com/ripoff-report-removal-bug-exposed-reputation-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seofriendly.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For over the past few years there have been thousands of business and individuals trying to figure out a way to make ripoffreport.com links about them not rank high on Google and other search engines. Reputation management was and still is the most common solution for having these nasty links rank lower. Reputation management firms [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For over the past few years there have been thousands of business and individuals trying to figure out a way to make <a href="http://www.ripoffreport.com/">ripoffreport.com</a> links about them not rank high on Google and other search engines. <strong>Reputation management was and still is the most common solution</strong> for having these nasty links rank lower. Reputation management firms like <strong><a href="http://www.reputation.com/">Reputation.com</a></strong> (Reputation Defender) and <a href="http://www.reputationarmor.com/">ReputationArmor.com</a> (<strong>Reputation Armor</strong>) use social media, profiles, blog posts, domain names, press releases, fresh content and search engine optimization to basically bury (hide) the negative links deeper within search engine result pages.</p>
<p>Read The Full Story: <a href="http://www.seofriendly.com/hacking-ripoff-report-reputation-management-style/">http://www.seofriendly.com/hacking-ripoff-report-reputation-management-style/</a> </p>
<p>Up until a few weeks ago there was another way to remove ripoff reports from search engines completely, that is until RipoffReport.com and it’s owner Ed Magedson discovered a glitch in there own website that was allowing extremely internet savvy computer geeks and “black hat” reputation management firms to insert a small string of html code in the name and title fields of the website when creating an account. This code was not visible to ripoff report and the code was a simple “noindex” code that told search engines like Google <em>not to allow</em> the page with this code on it to appear on search engines at all.</p>
<p> Read It Here: <a href="http://www.seofriendly.com/hacking-ripoff-report-reputation-management-style/">http://www.seofriendly.com/hacking-ripoff-report-reputation-management-style/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seofriendly.com/ripoff-report-removal-bug-exposed-reputation-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hacking RipOff Report Reputation Management Style</title>
		<link>http://www.seofriendly.com/hacking-ripoff-report-reputation-management-style/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seofriendly.com/hacking-ripoff-report-reputation-management-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RipOff Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seofriendly.com/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Hacking RipOffReport.com For over the past few years there have been thousands of business and individuals trying to figure out a way to make ripoffreport.com links about them not rank high on Google and other search engines. Reputation management was and still is the most common solution for having these nasty links rank lower. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1>Hacking RipOffReport.com</h1>
<p>For over the past few years there have been thousands of business and individuals trying to figure out a way to make <a href="http://www.ripoffreport.com/">ripoffreport.com</a> links about them not rank high on Google and other search engines. <strong>Reputation management was and still is the most common solution</strong> for having these nasty links rank lower. Reputation management firms like <strong><a href="http://www.reputation.com/">Reputation.com</a></strong> (Reputation Defender) and <a href="http://www.reputationarmor.com/">ReputationArmor.com</a> (<strong>Reputation Armor</strong>) use social media, profiles, blog posts, domain names, press releases, fresh content and search engine optimization to basically bury (hide) the negative links deeper within search engine result pages.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Up until a few weeks ago there was another way to remove ripoff reports from search engines completely, that is until RipoffReport.com and it’s owner Ed Magedson discovered a glitch in there own website that was allowing extremely internet savvy computer geeks and “black hat” reputation management firms to insert a small string of html code in the name and title fields of the website when creating an account. This code was not visible to ripoff report and the code was a simple “noindex” code that told search engines like Google <em>not to allow</em> the page with this code on it to appear on search engines at all.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Here is an example of the code:</strong><br />
meta name=&#8221;robots&#8221; content=&#8221;noindex&#8221;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>In order for this code to work you had to make an account at ripoff report and go to your account profile where you manage your name and location. You could simply copy &amp; paste that code behind your display name field. After this, the last step was to make a comment on the ripoff report you wanted to disappear. Within a few days (up to 30), when Google “Re-Crawled” that page, they would see the code telling them not to index it and presto the ripoff report was off the search engine.</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reputationarmor.com/">Reputation management firms</a> and SEO firms were offering a service that claims to “Remove RipOff Reports” completely from search engines within 30 days or less. Businesses pay thousands of dollars to have these links removed and buried and normally thousands of dollars is warranted because it takes a lot of content, work, and money to actually bury a bad link as strong as RipOff Report. However, the “code injection method” only took a few minutes to implement and was very easy to do. Firms offering this service were making a killing! The service fees were basically 100% profit.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Now all of the people that signed up for this type of service involving the “magic fix” are back in line waiting for anther way to remove the ripoff links about them, thanks to the bug being fixed by Ed Magedson and his team of Consumer Advocate Crusaders. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Not only are all the ripoff reports about people that used the “code injection” back, they are ranking stronger than ever!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Looks like it is back to good old reputation management techniques for firms like Reputation Armor and Reputation.com!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>ReputationArmor.com commented to us about the code</strong> and said they were unaware of such a code and have never used it, also saying that had they known about it they would have been tempted to use it on behalf off their clients. Reputation Armor says they use good quality content and search engine optimization methods to out rank negative links for clients and such “quick fixes” are in most cases short-term anyway.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>A Reputation.com (Reputation Defender) representative</strong> from the sales dept. named “KC” or “Casey”, stated he was not aware of such a code and went on to say: “We use a Blunt force approach, where we use positive content, there is no technology to make ripoff reports disappear like that, that I am aware of.”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Although this sales representative was unaware of such tactics, we were unable to reach anyone in the department to answer that question. We called at 9:30 AM EST and that was too early for the West Coast reputation firm to have someone more qualified for us to talk with.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>We discover this bug from an email sent to us from a client of a Reputation Firm that used the tactic and is now looking for a similar solution. There seem to be a lot of these firms’ clients looking for answers. In no way are we stating that Reputation Armor or Reputation.com used this code or even knew about it, we cite them because of their strong presence in the Reputation Management industry. </em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>If you have any information on the “Bug” or if you represent RipOff Report we would love to hear more about this. Please leave a comment and tell us the scoop!</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seofriendly.com/hacking-ripoff-report-reputation-management-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Company Offers $99 SEO Service</title>
		<link>http://www.seofriendly.com/seo-company-offers-99-seo-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seofriendly.com/seo-company-offers-99-seo-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[List Of The Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organic SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PageRank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seofriendly.com/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hiring an SEO Company can be a daunting task, especially since there are hundreds if not thousands of companies online that offer SEO services. How do you know which SEO company will actually deliver results? Which one is overcharging? Which ones are scams? It can be hard to answer these questions on your own, so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiring an SEO Company can be a daunting task, especially since there are hundreds if not thousands of companies online that offer SEO services. How do you know which SEO company will actually deliver results? Which one is overcharging? Which ones are scams? It can be hard to answer these questions on your own, so we will be featuring a trusted SEO each month that we believe to be worth looking in to.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>SEO Company Of The Month:</strong> <strong>DotShot – DotShot.com</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>DotShot.com is a smaller yet very affordable <a href="http://www.dotshot.com/">SEO Service</a> that offers SEO Packages starting at $99 per month and also has packages that cost $299-$499 per month. For larger clients with more competitive keywords they have custom pricing.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The DotShot SEO Service was founded in 2003 by a small group of search engine marketing professionals with over 10 years of experience in online marketing and search engine optimization.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The name DotShot is a spin off of “Hot Shot” and the name DotShot is referring to making your company an internet hot shot or maybe the SEO Firm is saying they are SEO Hot Shots? Either way DotShot shared some of there client success stories with us and they have delivered some impressive results for their clients.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>They have delivered top 10 results for hundreds of keywords and hundreds of clients. The DotShot team manages dozens of high profile clients and hundreds of small businesses Monthly SEO Campaigns.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Their SEO Packages are very attractive and affordable. Their “Grow” package is the most poplar and purportedly most effective. At $299 per month with a recommended 12 month term the “Grow” package is designed to deliver top ranking for 1-3 keywords and help brand your business on social networks. Each package includes link building campaigns that will generate quality backlinks for your site at a pace that is acceptable by Google.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Other packages include the popular $99 per month SEO package that packs a punch for smaller companies and local search results.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>To learn more about the DotShot <a href="http://www.dotshot.com/">SEO Company</a> and the SEO Service they offer visit them online:</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.dotshot.com/">www.DotShot.com</a><br />Phone: 1-800-989-1172</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seofriendly.com/seo-company-offers-99-seo-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting Black Hat SEO Video</title>
		<link>http://www.seofriendly.com/interesting-black-hat-seo-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seofriendly.com/interesting-black-hat-seo-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seofriendly.com/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this video on SearchEngineWatch.com, it is a Video put togeter by Jonathan Allen while at the SES London event in 2009. It asks 50 SEO&#8217;s a simple question: What should we do with the balck hat seo&#8217;s?   What do you think? Post your answer below!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this video on SearchEngineWatch.com, it is a Video put togeter by Jonathan Allen while at the SES London event in 2009. It asks 50 SEO&#8217;s a simple question: What should we do with the balck hat seo&#8217;s?</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/U2mxGbrCI9M&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/U2mxGbrCI9M&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
<p> </p>
<p>What do you think? Post your answer below!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seofriendly.com/interesting-black-hat-seo-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

